Question 1
When we are watching TV and see the things that are happening now, it is quite clear to all of us that terrorism is increasing in every corner of the globe. Everyday you hear of kidnapping and car-bomb attack; it does not matter which daily newspaper you open, you will find there the headline dealing with traumatic experience of terrorism. Many people are sometimes afraid.
Extensive studies have proved that terrorism occurs when there is social or political injustice and religious conflicts, often when one community faces discrimination. According to terrorists, violence may bring social and/or political change. Countries such as Nigeria, Mali, Somalia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq and Syria have always been the theatre of terrorist attacks.
Further, another source of the terrorism may be the vengeance of weak people because of the bad policy of strong leaders of the world. Palpable example is what often occurs in the USA, in France and in England. September 11th, 2001 is the most destructive day in the long blood history of terrorism. It could be the most important day too, because it led the American president Bush to declare a war that would not end until every terrorist group has been found, stopped and defeated.
To prevent repeated cases of terrorism in today’s world, the government of every country ought to right things and treat everybody without any racial discrimination.
QUESTIONS BASED ON THE TEXT:
1. The title which suits the second paragraph is :
Le deuxième paragraphe explique :
Le terrorisme apparaît lorsqu’il y a injustice sociale ou politique.
Il peut être causé par des conflits religieux.
Il surgit quand une communauté fait face à la discrimination.
Les terroristes pensent que la violence peut apporter un changement social ou politique.
Plusieurs pays sont cités comme théâtres d’attaques terroristes.
👉 Tout ce paragraphe expose les causes principales du terrorisme.
La seule option qui résume fidèlement ce contenu est donc :
✅ d. Major causes of terrorism
When we are watching TV and see the things that are happening now, it is quite clear to all of us that terrorism is increasing in every corner of the globe. Everyday you hear of kidnapping and car-bomb attack; it does not matter which daily newspaper you open, you will find there the headline dealing with traumatic experience of terrorism. Many people are sometimes afraid.
Extensive studies have proved that terrorism occurs when there is social or political injustice and religious conflicts, often when one community faces discrimination. According to terrorists, violence may bring social and/or political change. Countries such as Nigeria, Mali, Somalia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq and Syria have always been the theatre of terrorist attacks.
Further, another source of the terrorism may be the vengeance of weak people because of the bad policy of strong leaders of the world. Palpable example is what often occurs in the USA, in France and in England. September 11th, 2001 is the most destructive day in the long blood history of terrorism. It could be the most important day too, because it led the American president Bush to declare a war that would not end until every terrorist group has been found, stopped and defeated.
To prevent repeated cases of terrorism in today’s world, the government of every country ought to right things and treat everybody without any racial discrimination.
QUESTIONS BASED ON THE TEXT:
2. According to the text, president Bush decided to find :
Le texte dit clairement que les attentats du 11 septembre 2001 ont poussé le président Bush à déclarer une guerre qui ne s’arrêterait que lorsque :
“every terrorist group has been found, stopped and defeated.”
Donc, il a décidé de trouver les terroristes, pas la paix, ni l’événement, ni l’insécurité, ni la pauvreté.
When we are watching TV and see the things that are happening now, it is quite clear to all of us that terrorism is increasing in every corner of the globe. Everyday you hear of kidnapping and car-bomb attack; it does not matter which daily newspaper you open, you will find there the headline dealing with traumatic experience of terrorism. Many people are sometimes afraid.
Extensive studies have proved that terrorism occurs when there is social or political injustice and religious conflicts, often when one community faces discrimination. According to terrorists, violence may bring social and/or political change. Countries such as Nigeria, Mali, Somalia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq and Syria have always been the theatre of terrorist attacks.
Further, another source of the terrorism may be the vengeance of weak people because of the bad policy of strong leaders of the world. Palpable example is what often occurs in the USA, in France and in England. September 11th, 2001 is the most destructive day in the long blood history of terrorism. It could be the most important day too, because it led the American president Bush to declare a war that would not end until every terrorist group has been found, stopped and defeated.
To prevent repeated cases of terrorism in today’s world, the government of every country ought to right things and treat everybody without any racial discrimination.
QUESTIONS BASED ON THE TEXT:
3.As far as the passage is concerned the bad effect of terrorism is that it :
Dans le premier paragraphe, le texte dit clairement que :
“Everyday you hear of kidnapping and car‑bomb attack… you will find headlines dealing with traumatic experience of terrorism. Many people are sometimes afraid.”
L’effet négatif mis en avant ici est la peur que le terrorisme provoque chez les gens qui regardent la télévision ou lisent les journaux.
When we are watching TV and see the things that are happening now, it is quite clear to all of us that terrorism is increasing in every corner of the globe. Everyday you hear of kidnapping and car-bomb attack; it does not matter which daily newspaper you open, you will find there the headline dealing with traumatic experience of terrorism. Many people are sometimes afraid.
Extensive studies have proved that terrorism occurs when there is social or political injustice and religious conflicts, often when one community faces discrimination. According to terrorists, violence may bring social and/or political change. Countries such as Nigeria, Mali, Somalia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq and Syria have always been the theatre of terrorist attacks.
Further, another source of the terrorism may be the vengeance of weak people because of the bad policy of strong leaders of the world. Palpable example is what often occurs in the USA, in France and in England. September 11th, 2001 is the most destructive day in the long blood history of terrorism. It could be the most important day too, because it led the American president Bush to declare a war that would not end until every terrorist group has been found, stopped and defeated.
To prevent repeated cases of terrorism in today’s world, the government of every country ought to right things and treat everybody without any racial discrimination.
QUESTIONS BASED ON THE TEXT:
4.The idea that terrorism can be avoided can be found in the paragraph(s) :
Le quatrième paragraphe dit clairement :
“To prevent repeated cases of terrorism in today’s world, the government of every country ought to right things and treat everybody without any racial discrimination.”
C’est la seule partie du texte qui explique comment éviter le terrorisme :
corriger les injustices,
traiter tout le monde sans discrimination.
Aucun autre paragraphe ne parle de prévention.
When we are watching TV and see the things that are happening now, it is quite clear to all of us that terrorism is increasing in every corner of the globe. Everyday you hear of kidnapping and car-bomb attack; it does not matter which daily newspaper you open, you will find there the headline dealing with traumatic experience of terrorism. Many people are sometimes afraid.
Extensive studies have proved that terrorism occurs when there is social or political injustice and religious conflicts, often when one community faces discrimination. According to terrorists, violence may bring social and/or political change. Countries such as Nigeria, Mali, Somalia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq and Syria have always been the theatre of terrorist attacks.
Further, another source of the terrorism may be the vengeance of weak people because of the bad policy of strong leaders of the world. Palpable example is what often occurs in the USA, in France and in England. September 11th, 2001 is the most destructive day in the long blood history of terrorism. It could be the most important day too, because it led the American president Bush to declare a war that would not end until every terrorist group has been found, stopped and defeated.
To prevent repeated cases of terrorism in today’s world, the government of every country ought to right things and treat everybody without any racial discrimination.
QUESTIONS BASED ON THE TEXT:
5. The moral lesson that political leaders can draw through this passage is to :
Le dernier paragraphe du texte donne clairement la leçon morale :
“the government of every country ought to right things and treat everybody without any racial discrimination.”
👉 Cela signifie que les dirigeants doivent mettre fin à l’injustice, corriger les mauvaises pratiques et traiter tout le monde équitablement.
La seule option qui correspond à cette idée est :
✅ b. Stop on with injustice.
(= arrêter l’injustice)
When we are watching TV and see the things that are happening now, it is quite clear to all of us that terrorism is increasing in every corner of the globe. Everyday you hear of kidnapping and car-bomb attack; it does not matter which daily newspaper you open, you will find there the headline dealing with traumatic experience of terrorism. Many people are sometimes afraid.
Extensive studies have proved that terrorism occurs when there is social or political injustice and religious conflicts, often when one community faces discrimination. According to terrorists, violence may bring social and/or political change. Countries such as Nigeria, Mali, Somalia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq and Syria have always been the theatre of terrorist attacks.
Further, another source of the terrorism may be the vengeance of weak people because of the bad policy of strong leaders of the world. Palpable example is what often occurs in the USA, in France and in England. September 11th, 2001 is the most destructive day in the long blood history of terrorism. It could be the most important day too, because it led the American president Bush to declare a war that would not end until every terrorist group has been found, stopped and defeated.
To prevent repeated cases of terrorism in today’s world, the government of every country ought to right things and treat everybody without any racial discrimination.
QUESTIONS BASED ON THE TEXT:
6. Indicates the right associations of the words in column (1_5):
1. Blood ;
2. Discrimination ;
3. Kidnap ;
4.Policy ;
5.Terrorism
with their meaning in column (a-b):
a.Take away so as to ask money for returning him,
b.Large print at the top in a newspaper;
c. Act of treating people unfairly;
d. Planned course of action based on particular principles. e.g : plan of government ;
e. Red liquid in the body. ;
f. Act of bringing change in the government by killing.
Voici pourquoi cette association est la seule correcte :
1. Blood → e. Red liquid in the body
2. Discrimination → c. Act of treating people unfairly
3. Kidnap → a. Take away so as to ask money for returning him
4. Policy → d. Planned course of action based on particular principles
5. Terrorism → f. Act of bringing change in the government by killing
Chaque mot correspond exactement à sa définition.
7. ……..Amazon is …. World’s second largest river.
On ne met pas d’article devant Amazon car c’est un nom propre de fleuve.
On met the devant world’s second largest river car c’est un superlatif + un groupe nominal unique.
“Amazon is the world’s second largest river.”
8.The old man …. the letter was sent is absent.
La phrase complète devient :
“The old man to whom the letter was sent is absent.”
Ici, on a besoin d’un pronom relatif + préposition pour introduire le complément :
the letter was sent to the old man → the old man to whom the letter was sent
C’est la seule option grammaticalement correcte.
9.My friend Robert got his state diploma ….. Saint Joseph College.
On dit en anglais :
to get a diploma from a school / college / university
Donc la phrase correcte est :
“My friend Robert got his state diploma from Saint Joseph College.”
The millions of people who cross the Atlantic every year usually do so by jet. These planes are fast, safe and convenient. But in the past, all Atlantic took ships. The first ocean liners were primitive. On early 19th century sailing ships, cabins were cold and wet. Food was fresh only on the first day, and the passengers suffered constantly from the condition. In those days, one out of six sailing ships crossing the Atlantic sank. But by the end of the 19th century, along with improved safety came comfort and, in some cases, luxury. Ocean liners were strictly divides by class. Down below, hundreds of immigrants were crowded together in steerage, the section having the poorest accommodations. Up above, first class passengers had private rooms with marble bathrooms, and they ate in elegant dining rooms.
After World War 1, taking the boat to Europe became fashionable end popular for tourists as well as the rich. Bigger and bigger ships were built that carried a million tourists a year to Europe. This was the time of the greatest ocean liners. They were faster and more comfortable, and they offered food and luxuries comparable to good hotels.
In 1942, the French liner Normandy was destroyed by a fire, and today almost all of the other great ocean liners are gone, too. They have been put out of business by jets. Jets are crowded, they aren’t elegant, and they serve mediocre food, but they are fast Planes cross the Atlantic in six hours instead of six days.
QUESTION BASED ON THE TEXT:
1. The title which suits the first paragraph is :
Le premier paragraphe explique :
Comment les gens traversent l’Atlantique aujourd’hui (en jet).
Comment ils le faisaient autrefois (en bateaux).
Les conditions difficiles des premiers voyages.
L’évolution vers plus de sécurité et de confort.
👉 Tout le paragraphe décrit la traversée de l’Atlantique, passée et présente.
La seule option qui résume fidèlement ce contenu est donc :b. Crossing the Atlantic
The millions of people who cross the Atlantic every year usually do so by jet. These planes are fast, safe and convenient. But in the past, all Atlantic took ships. The first ocean liners were primitive. On early 19th century sailing ships, cabins were cold and wet. Food was fresh only on the first day, and the passengers suffered constantly from the condition. In those days, one out of six sailing ships crossing the Atlantic sank. But by the end of the 19th century, along with improved safety came comfort and, in some cases, luxury. Ocean liners were strictly divides by class. Down below, hundreds of immigrants were crowded together in steerage, the section having the poorest accommodations. Up above, first class passengers had private rooms with marble bathrooms, and they ate in elegant dining rooms.
After World War 1, taking the boat to Europe became fashionable end popular for tourists as well as the rich. Bigger and bigger ships were built that carried a million tourists a year to Europe. This was the time of the greatest ocean liners. They were faster and more comfortable, and they offered food and luxuries comparable to good hotels.
In 1942, the French liner Normandy was destroyed by a fire, and today almost all of the other great ocean liners are gone, too. They have been put out of business by jets. Jets are crowded, they aren’t elegant, and they serve mediocre food, but they are fast Planes cross the Atlantic in six hours instead of six days.
QUESTION BASED ON THE TEXT:
2.According to the text, sailing trips were popular in 20th century because :
Le texte dit clairement, dans le premier paragraphe, que :
Les premiers bateaux étaient primitifs et inconfortables.
Mais à la fin du 19ᵉ siècle, le confort et même le luxe sont apparus.
Les passagers de première classe avaient :
des chambres privées,
des salles de bain en marbre,
des salles à manger élégantes. Puis, dans le deuxième paragraphe, on lit :
“After World War I, taking the boat to Europe became fashionable and popular for tourists as well as the rich.”
👉 Cela signifie que les voyages en bateau étaient populaires parce qu’ils étaient confortables et luxueux, surtout pour les voyageurs de première classe.
Donc la seule option qui correspond au texte est :
✅ d. Travelers of the first class made their journey in good condition.
The millions of people who cross the Atlantic every year usually do so by jet. These planes are fast, safe and convenient. But in the past, all Atlantic took ships. The first ocean liners were primitive. On early 19th century sailing ships, cabins were cold and wet. Food was fresh only on the first day, and the passengers suffered constantly from the condition. In those days, one out of six sailing ships crossing the Atlantic sank. But by the end of the 19th century, along with improved safety came comfort and, in some cases, luxury. Ocean liners were strictly divides by class. Down below, hundreds of immigrants were crowded together in steerage, the section having the poorest accommodations. Up above, first class passengers had private rooms with marble bathrooms, and they ate in elegant dining rooms.
After World War 1, taking the boat to Europe became fashionable end popular for tourists as well as the rich. Bigger and bigger ships were built that carried a million tourists a year to Europe. This was the time of the greatest ocean liners. They were faster and more comfortable, and they offered food and luxuries comparable to good hotels.
In 1942, the French liner Normandy was destroyed by a fire, and today almost all of the other great ocean liners are gone, too. They have been put out of business by jets. Jets are crowded, they aren’t elegant, and they serve mediocre food, but they are fast Planes cross the Atlantic in six hours instead of six days.
QUESTION BASED ON THE TEXT:
3.The idea that enormous ships disappeared occurs in paragraph(s) :
L’idée que les grands paquebots ont disparu apparaît clairement dans le troisième paragraphe :
“…today almost all of the other great ocean liners are gone, too. They have been put out of business by jets.”
👉 C’est uniquement dans ce paragraphe que le texte explique que les énormes navires ont disparu à cause des jets.
The millions of people who cross the Atlantic every year usually do so by jet. These planes are fast, safe and convenient. But in the past, all Atlantic took ships. The first ocean liners were primitive. On early 19th century sailing ships, cabins were cold and wet. Food was fresh only on the first day, and the passengers suffered constantly from the condition. In those days, one out of six sailing ships crossing the Atlantic sank. But by the end of the 19th century, along with improved safety came comfort and, in some cases, luxury. Ocean liners were strictly divides by class. Down below, hundreds of immigrants were crowded together in steerage, the section having the poorest accommodations. Up above, first class passengers had private rooms with marble bathrooms, and they ate in elegant dining rooms.
After World War 1, taking the boat to Europe became fashionable end popular for tourists as well as the rich. Bigger and bigger ships were built that carried a million tourists a year to Europe. This was the time of the greatest ocean liners. They were faster and more comfortable, and they offered food and luxuries comparable to good hotels.
In 1942, the French liner Normandy was destroyed by a fire, and today almost all of the other great ocean liners are gone, too. They have been put out of business by jets. Jets are crowded, they aren’t elegant, and they serve mediocre food, but they are fast Planes cross the Atlantic in six hours instead of six days.
QUESTION BASED ON THE TEXT:
4. The advantage(s) of ships in 20th century compared to planes is/are that they
Dans le texte, on apprend que les paquebots du 20ᵉ siècle avaient une particularité importante :
Ils étaient strictement divisés par classe :
Down below : les immigrants en steerage (conditions pauvres)
Up above : les passagers de première classe (luxe, salles de bain en marbre, salles à manger élégantes)
Cette organisation par classes est un élément qui caractérise les navires, mais pas les avions.
C’est donc un avantage comparatif des bateaux par rapport aux avions, même si ce n’est pas un avantage “positif”, c’est bien une différence structurelle mentionnée dans le texte.
The millions of people who cross the Atlantic every year usually do so by jet. These planes are fast, safe and convenient. But in the past, all Atlantic took ships. The first ocean liners were primitive. On early 19th century sailing ships, cabins were cold and wet. Food was fresh only on the first day, and the passengers suffered constantly from the condition. In those days, one out of six sailing ships crossing the Atlantic sank. But by the end of the 19th century, along with improved safety came comfort and, in some cases, luxury. Ocean liners were strictly divides by class. Down below, hundreds of immigrants were crowded together in steerage, the section having the poorest accommodations. Up above, first class passengers had private rooms with marble bathrooms, and they ate in elegant dining rooms.
After World War 1, taking the boat to Europe became fashionable end popular for tourists as well as the rich. Bigger and bigger ships were built that carried a million tourists a year to Europe. This was the time of the greatest ocean liners. They were faster and more comfortable, and they offered food and luxuries comparable to good hotels.
In 1942, the French liner Normandy was destroyed by a fire, and today almost all of the other great ocean liners are gone, too. They have been put out of business by jets. Jets are crowded, they aren’t elegant, and they serve mediocre food, but they are fast Planes cross the Atlantic in six hours instead of six days.
QUESTION BASED ON THE TEXT:
5.Indicate the right associations of the words in column (1_5) :
1. Convenient ;
2. Jet ;
3.Liner ;
4.Marble ,
5.Steerage
with their meanings in column (a-b):
a. engine causing an aero plane to go forwards ;
b. hard stone which is polished and user buildings ;
c. part of a ship in which one may travel at low cost ;
d. state of being high , distance from the top to the ;
e. large ship which carries people across the ocean ;
f. Suiting one’s time and needs, causing comfort
Correspondances exactes
1. Convenient → f. Suiting one’s time and needs, causing comfort
👉 Convenient = pratique, qui arrange.
2. Jet → a. Engine causing an aeroplane to go forwards
👉 Jet = avion à réaction / moteur à réaction.
3. Liner → e. Large ship which carries people across the ocean
👉 Liner = paquebot.
4. Marble → b. Hard stone which is polished and used in buildings
👉 Marble = marbre.
5. Steerage → c. Part of a ship in which one may travel at low cost
👉 Steerage = entrepont, classe économique des bateaux.
The millions of people who cross the Atlantic every year usually do so by jet. These planes are fast, safe and convenient. But in the past, all Atlantic took ships. The first ocean liners were primitive. On early 19th century sailing ships, cabins were cold and wet. Food was fresh only on the first day, and the passengers suffered constantly from the condition. In those days, one out of six sailing ships crossing the Atlantic sank. But by the end of the 19th century, along with improved safety came comfort and, in some cases, luxury. Ocean liners were strictly divides by class. Down below, hundreds of immigrants were crowded together in steerage, the section having the poorest accommodations. Up above, first class passengers had private rooms with marble bathrooms, and they ate in elegant dining rooms.
After World War 1, taking the boat to Europe became fashionable end popular for tourists as well as the rich. Bigger and bigger ships were built that carried a million tourists a year to Europe. This was the time of the greatest ocean liners. They were faster and more comfortable, and they offered food and luxuries comparable to good hotels.
In 1942, the French liner Normandy was destroyed by a fire, and today almost all of the other great ocean liners are gone, too. They have been put out of business by jets. Jets are crowded, they aren’t elegant, and they serve mediocre food, but they are fast Planes cross the Atlantic in six hours instead of six days.
QUESTION BASED ON THE TEXT:
6.It is said in the text that in 20th century planes were :
Le texte dit clairement, dans le troisième paragraphe, que les jets :
“are crowded”
“aren’t elegant”
“serve mediocre food”
👉 Donc, ils ne sont pas très confortables, même s’ils sont rapides.
C’est exactement ce que dit l’option c.
7.Indicate the missing words in the second sentence : Christiano and his team – mate said : « We may score two goals ». They said that they ……… score two goals.
Dans le discours indirect, may devient might.
Phrase directe : “We may score two goals.”
Phrase indirecte : “They said that they might score two goals.”
👉 C’est la transformation correcte du modal may au passé.
8.Indicate the missing word in the sentence « Bob and you will visit Moanda ……. ? », the missing words are :
Il s’agit d’un tag question.
La règle est simple :
Phrase affirmative → tag négatif
Sujet “Bob and you” = you
Verbe will → tag = won’t
👉 Donc la phrase correcte est :
“Bob and you will visit Moanda, won’t you?”
9.Indicate the right association of these verbs.
Parmi les propositions, seule la série suivante correspond correctement aux trois formes d’un verbe irrégulier :
Drink (infinitif)
Drank (prétérit)
Drunk (participe passé)
Toutes les autres options contiennent des formes incorrectes :
a. Dig, dug, dag → dag n’existe pas.
b. Smell, smelt, smeld → smeld n’existe pas.
c. Fly, flew, flow → le participe passé est flown, pas flow.
e. Blow, blew, blow → le participe passé est blown.
Donc la seule série correcte est d.
English has had a long tradition of borrowing words from other languages. This tradition began with the conquest of Britain by the Norman – French in 1066. Because these conquerors established themselves as rulers, their dialect of French became the language of aristocracy, of government, and of education. During this period, many French words came in the English language. Another strong influx of vocabulary came from Latin, which was the language of the church. Today, those words derived from French and Latin, though still identifiable, as such, are an inseparable part of English vocabulary and are not thought of as foreign by English speakers. In fact, the first two sentences of this paragraph contain three words that come to us from this tradition : tradition, languages, and conquest.
The Britsh colonial era, which began with outposts in North America in the early seventeeth century, brought English speakers into contact with many other languages. In North America, words from the Native American peoples quickly found their way into the language. Exemples include moccasin (a kind of soft shoe), squash (a vegetable), and succotash (a dish made with corn and squash).
The presence of Spanish colonies in North America led to the adoption of numerous spanish words, such as siesta (a nap) and tortilla (a flat thin pancake made of wheat of corn flour). Asian languages also made contributions. For example, the word pajamas comes from a Hindi work, khaki comes from Urdu, a,d ketchup was borrowed from Chinese.
Words from African languages, too, made their way into English during the time that slavery was an institution in the United States. Okra (a vegetable) and goober (peanut) are exemples.
The results of all of this absorption of new words is a very rich vocabulary that allows users of English to express subtlety of meaning and also formality and informality thought their choice of words.
QUESTION BASED ON THE TEXT:
1. The following ideas concerning the English language are contained in the first paragraph :
La question demande : quelles idées figurent dans le premier paragraphe uniquement.
Dans ce premier paragraphe, on apprend que :
L’anglais a une longue tradition d’emprunts linguistiques.
Cette tradition commence avec la conquête normande.
Beaucoup de mots viennent du français.
Beaucoup de mots viennent du latin.
Ces mots sont aujourd’hui intégrés au vocabulaire anglais.
Donc la seule idée présente dans ce paragraphe est :
d. English has borrowed many words from French and Latin.
English has had a long tradition of borrowing words from other languages. This tradition began with the conquest of Britain by the Norman – French in 1066. Because these conquerors established themselves as rulers, their dialect of French became the language of aristocracy, of government, and of education. During this period, many French words came in the English language. Another strong influx of vocabulary came from Latin, which was the language of the church. Today, those words derived from French and Latin, though still identifiable, as such, are an inseparable part of English vocabulary and are not thought of as foreign by English speakers. In fact, the first two sentences of this paragraph contain three words that come to us from this tradition : tradition, languages, and conquest.
The Britsh colonial era, which began with outposts in North America in the early seventeeth century, brought English speakers into contact with many other languages. In North America, words from the Native American peoples quickly found their way into the language. Exemples include moccasin (a kind of soft shoe), squash (a vegetable), and succotash (a dish made with corn and squash).
The presence of Spanish colonies in North America led to the adoption of numerous spanish words, such as siesta (a nap) and tortilla (a flat thin pancake made of wheat of corn flour). Asian languages also made contributions. For example, the word pajamas comes from a Hindi work, khaki comes from Urdu, a,d ketchup was borrowed from Chinese.
Words from African languages, too, made their way into English during the time that slavery was an institution in the United States. Okra (a vegetable) and goober (peanut) are exemples.
The results of all of this absorption of new words is a very rich vocabulary that allows users of English to express subtlety of meaning and also formality and informality thought their choice of words.
QUESTION BASED ON THE TEXT:
2. According to the text, many French words came into the English language during the…
Le premier paragraphe dit clairement :
“This tradition began with the conquest of Britain by the Norman–French in 1066… During this period, many French words came in the English language.”
Donc, les mots français sont entrés massivement dans l’anglais au moment de la conquête de la Grande‑Bretagne par les Normands.
English has had a long tradition of borrowing words from other languages. This tradition began with the conquest of Britain by the Norman – French in 1066. Because these conquerors established themselves as rulers, their dialect of French became the language of aristocracy, of government, and of education. During this period, many French words came in the English language. Another strong influx of vocabulary came from Latin, which was the language of the church. Today, those words derived from French and Latin, though still identifiable, as such, are an inseparable part of English vocabulary and are not thought of as foreign by English speakers. In fact, the first two sentences of this paragraph contain three words that come to us from this tradition : tradition, languages, and conquest.
The Britsh colonial era, which began with outposts in North America in the early seventeeth century, brought English speakers into contact with many other languages. In North America, words from the Native American peoples quickly found their way into the language. Exemples include moccasin (a kind of soft shoe), squash (a vegetable), and succotash (a dish made with corn and squash).
The presence of Spanish colonies in North America led to the adoption of numerous spanish words, such as siesta (a nap) and tortilla (a flat thin pancake made of wheat of corn flour). Asian languages also made contributions. For example, the word pajamas comes from a Hindi work, khaki comes from Urdu, a,d ketchup was borrowed from Chinese.
Words from African languages, too, made their way into English during the time that slavery was an institution in the United States. Okra (a vegetable) and goober (peanut) are exemples.
The results of all of this absorption of new words is a very rich vocabulary that allows users of English to express subtlety of meaning and also formality and informality thought their choice of words.
QUESTION BASED ON THE TEXT:
3. The pair of words that has the same vowel sound is :
On cherche le même son vocalique (même voyelle prononcée).
Regardons les sons :
a. other / such
other → /ˈʌðər/
such → /sʌtʃ/ Les deux contiennent le même son /ʌ/. C’est correct.
English has had a long tradition of borrowing words from other languages. This tradition began with the conquest of Britain by the Norman – French in 1066. Because these conquerors established themselves as rulers, their dialect of French became the language of aristocracy, of government, and of education. During this period, many French words came in the English language. Another strong influx of vocabulary came from Latin, which was the language of the church. Today, those words derived from French and Latin, though still identifiable, as such, are an inseparable part of English vocabulary and are not thought of as foreign by English speakers. In fact, the first two sentences of this paragraph contain three words that come to us from this tradition : tradition, languages, and conquest.
The Britsh colonial era, which began with outposts in North America in the early seventeeth century, brought English speakers into contact with many other languages. In North America, words from the Native American peoples quickly found their way into the language. Exemples include moccasin (a kind of soft shoe), squash (a vegetable), and succotash (a dish made with corn and squash).
The presence of Spanish colonies in North America led to the adoption of numerous spanish words, such as siesta (a nap) and tortilla (a flat thin pancake made of wheat of corn flour). Asian languages also made contributions. For example, the word pajamas comes from a Hindi work, khaki comes from Urdu, a,d ketchup was borrowed from Chinese.
Words from African languages, too, made their way into English during the time that slavery was an institution in the United States. Okra (a vegetable) and goober (peanut) are exemples.
The results of all of this absorption of new words is a very rich vocabulary that allows users of English to express subtlety of meaning and also formality and informality thought their choice of words.
QUESTION BASED ON THE TEXT:
4. Rulers means :
Dans le texte, on lit :
“Because these conquerors established themselves as rulers, their dialect of French became the language of aristocracy…”
Ici, rulers signifie clairement les personnes qui gouvernent, c’est‑à‑dire les dirigeants, les autorités.
Donc la seule définition correcte est :
c. People who govern a body of people
English has had a long tradition of borrowing words from other languages. This tradition began with the conquest of Britain by the Norman – French in 1066. Because these conquerors established themselves as rulers, their dialect of French became the language of aristocracy, of government, and of education. During this period, many French words came in the English language. Another strong influx of vocabulary came from Latin, which was the language of the church. Today, those words derived from French and Latin, though still identifiable, as such, are an inseparable part of English vocabulary and are not thought of as foreign by English speakers. In fact, the first two sentences of this paragraph contain three words that come to us from this tradition : tradition, languages, and conquest.
The Britsh colonial era, which began with outposts in North America in the early seventeeth century, brought English speakers into contact with many other languages. In North America, words from the Native American peoples quickly found their way into the language. Exemples include moccasin (a kind of soft shoe), squash (a vegetable), and succotash (a dish made with corn and squash).
The presence of Spanish colonies in North America led to the adoption of numerous spanish words, such as siesta (a nap) and tortilla (a flat thin pancake made of wheat of corn flour). Asian languages also made contributions. For example, the word pajamas comes from a Hindi work, khaki comes from Urdu, a,d ketchup was borrowed from Chinese.
Words from African languages, too, made their way into English during the time that slavery was an institution in the United States. Okra (a vegetable) and goober (peanut) are exemples.
The results of all of this absorption of new words is a very rich vocabulary that allows users of English to express subtlety of meaning and also formality and informality thought their choice of words.
QUESTION BASED ON THE TEXT:
5. The Britsh colonial era brought English speakers into contact with many other languages, … ? The missing words to complete this sentence are :
Il s’agit d’une tag question.
La phrase est :
“The British colonial era brought English speakers into contact with many other languages, … ?”
Le verbe est brought → passé simple.
Le tag question utilise donc did / didn’t.
Le sujet logique est English speakers → they.
La phrase principale est affirmative, donc le tag doit être négatif.
didn’t they est la seule option correcte.
6.If I live in Lubumbashi ? I … at a bank. The missing phrase to complete this sentence is :
La phrase commence par If I lived in Lubumbashi, mais ici l’énoncé dit :
“If I live in Lubumbashi ? I … at a bank.”
C’est clairement un conditionnel irréel (type 2) : → If + past simple, would + base verb.
Même si l’énoncé utilise live au présent, l’intention EXETAT est le conditionnel irréel, donc la bonne transformation est :
I would work at a bank.
7.Hens … eggs. The appropriate verb to complete this sentence is :
Le sujet est hens (les poules), donc un nom pluriel. Mais attention : en anglais, le verbe to lay (pondre) se conjugue ainsi :
I lay
You lay
Hens lay (au présent simple)
👉 Donc la phrase correcte est :
Hens lay eggs.
8.He hasn’t even got a desk to write … The appropriate word to complete this sentence is :
En anglais, on utilise on pour parler de la surface sur laquelle on écrit.
He hasn’t even got a desk to write on. = Il n’a même pas de bureau sur lequel écrire.
C’est une structure très fréquente :
a chair to sit on
a bed to sleep on
a table to eat on
9.Peter can steal my books. The passive of this sentence is : My books … by Peter
La phrase active est :
Peter can steal my books.
Pour former la voix passive :
Le modal can reste can
On ajoute be
Le verbe principal passe au participe passé → stolen
Cela donne :
My books can be stolen by Peter.